Although the 1806 tax list, the subject of this post, was compiled only a year later than the one from the previous post, it is not simply a repeat of the 1805 information, at least as far as the Bullers were concerned.
Thus far we have discovered in this series that George Buller (Przechowka 350) settled in Franztal at least by 1767, probably in 1765 with the rest of the original residents. At that time George had a wife, a son, and a daughter. Twenty-six years later, in 1793, the tax list does not mention George except in terms of him formerly holding a lease, but that list does introduce us to additional Bullers: a Heinrich who was apparently George’s son, another Heinrich whose origin is not known, and Andreas, also of unknown origin.
Twelve years after that, in 1805, the tax list revealed that Heinrich son of George was dead and had left behind a widow and two unmarried daughters: Maria and Anna. The “other” Heinrich Buller was still on the scene and inhabiting the same plot. The Andreas from 1793 had been joined by another Andreas, identified as Jr. in the list, so presumably the eldest son of the original Andreas Buller.
That brings us to 1806, the list for which is reproduced below (see Goertz 2001, 50).
Lot 1Thus far we have discovered in this series that George Buller (Przechowka 350) settled in Franztal at least by 1767, probably in 1765 with the rest of the original residents. At that time George had a wife, a son, and a daughter. Twenty-six years later, in 1793, the tax list does not mention George except in terms of him formerly holding a lease, but that list does introduce us to additional Bullers: a Heinrich who was apparently George’s son, another Heinrich whose origin is not known, and Andreas, also of unknown origin.
Twelve years after that, in 1805, the tax list revealed that Heinrich son of George was dead and had left behind a widow and two unmarried daughters: Maria and Anna. The “other” Heinrich Buller was still on the scene and inhabiting the same plot. The Andreas from 1793 had been joined by another Andreas, identified as Jr. in the list, so presumably the eldest son of the original Andreas Buller.
That brings us to 1806, the list for which is reproduced below (see Goertz 2001, 50).
Hein Buller Jr.
Michel Kniese
Isaac Sperling
Heinrich Hahn
der v. Sachs zu DolgenMichel Kniese
Isaac Sperling
Lot 2
Hein Voot
Peter Voot
Joh. Sam. Renetz olim Schmidt
Lot 3Peter Voot
Joh. Sam. Renetz olim Schmidt
Hein. Buller
Johann Pappe olim Cornel. Voot
Jacob Richert
Lot 4Johann Pappe olim Cornel. Voot
Jacob Richert
Tens Voot
Johann Samuel Renitz
Lot 5Johann Samuel Renitz
David Dircks
Heinrich Dircks
Heinrich Dircks
Lot 6
Berend Retzlaff
Lot 7
Carl Ludwig Hintze
Berend Retzlaff
Lot 8
Wilh. Voot
Heinrich Voth
nunc: Carl Hintz from Netzbruch 17
Lot 9Heinrich Voth
nunc: Carl Hintz from Netzbruch 17
Tens Voot Jr.
Lot 10
Heinrich Dircks olim Schmidt
Lot 11
Berend Voot olim Schmidt
Heinrich Dircks
Lot 12Heinrich Dircks
Peter Jans Sr.
Peter Jans Jr.
Lot 13Peter Jans Jr.
David Voot
Jacob Becker
Lot 14Jacob Becker
Andreas Buller
Heinrich Voot
Tobias Sperling
Peter Jans Jr.
Lot 15Heinrich Voot
Tobias Sperling
Peter Jans Jr.
Jacob Becker
Benjamin Karenke
Friedr. Renitz
Lot 16Benjamin Karenke
Friedr. Renitz
Johann Becker
Lot 17
Peter Jans Jr.
Hein Voot
Lot 18Hein Voot
Tobias Voot
Lot 19
Jacob Voot
Johann Becker
Lot 20Johann Becker
Andreas Buller
The “other” Heinrich Buller (i.e., the one who definitely was not son of George 350) still inhabited plot 3, and the two Andreas Bullers still leased plots 14 and 20, just as they did a year earlier.
However, a big change took place with plot 1. In 1805 the lease-holders included Heinrich’s widow and two daughters. Now all three females have vanished from the list, their place taken by Heinrich Buller Jr. How do we explain the sudden appearance of Heinrich Jr.?
Presumably Heinrich Jr. was not yet an adult when his father died, so the rights to the land passed to his mother and his (presumably older) sisters. By 1806, however, Heinrich Jr. was ready to assume the responsibilities of an adult, which in that context meant taking over the lease and all of its rights and obligations. (An alternate explanation might be that Heinrich Jr. lived somewhere else in 1805 but returned by 1806 to take over the family plot. This is possible but highly speculative.)
One would think that Heinrich Jr. provided for his mother from the food and revenue generated by the family property, but it is also possible that she remarried. It is also likely that Jr.’s sisters Maria and Anna married at some point and raised their own families on their husbands’ plots. Even though we do not know happened to Jr.’s mother and sisters, we can say with certainty that Heinrich Jr. did follow in his father’s footsteps in farming Franztal plot 1. How long he did so will be answered, in part, in the fifth and final post on the Bullers of Franztal—after which we will be ready for a family scandal.
Work Cited
Goertz, Adalbert. 2001. Mennonites in Amt Driesen of the Neumark, Brandenburg, Prussia. Mennonite Family History 20:47–51.
No comments:
Post a Comment